Virtuals: A Guide for the Year Ahead

717 Summary

‍

The Virtuals Protocol ecosystem is entering another growth cycle.

‍

What began as an early experimental launchpad ($WIRE launched on OG Virtuals bonding curve) and social coordination layer has rapidly evolved into a high-velocity ecosystem on Base, driven by project onboarding mechanisms, dynamic volume concentrations, and expanding verticals - including robotics and real-world agent infrastructure.

‍

For users, traders, and builders, the most important takeaway is: 

Virtuals is no longer defined by a single asset or cohort of early projects. It is becoming an ecosystem where new launches, narrative rotation, and user attention increasingly drive volume and engagement.

This 717 report serves as a practical guide to how Virtuals has changed, what the on-chain data shows, and how users should position within the ecosystem for the year ahead.

‍

I. Virtuals Protocol: Expanding Ecosystem via Launch Mechanics

‍

In its earlier phase, Virtuals activity was heavily concentrated among a small group of initial projects ($AIXBT, $VADER, etc.). Volume, liquidity, and social attention were relatively tightly coupled around these few early projects. The introduction of Genesis launches attracted a fresh group of builders to the ecosystem ($ETHY, $AXR), whom aligned themselves closer to the ACP initiative at the time. As such, Genesis launches were the winners of their cycle, outperforming older projects that did not iterate around ACP.

‍

With the recent introduction of launch mechanisms like Pegasus, Unicorn, and Titan, newer projects are afforded increased flexibility in aligning with new Virtuals narratives such as Robotics. It is very likely next cycle's winners will gravitate around the most recent launch mechanisms and the latest Virtuals developments. 

‍

Ecosystem Changes:

‍

• New project launches now account for a disproportionate share of ecosystem volume relative to older project assets (88.61% vs 11.39%).
• Liquidity and mindshare rotates quicker between projects.
• User activity increasingly clusters around launch windows, rather than long-term holding behavior.

‍

Observed Data Signals:

‍

• Newly launched projects (0-90 days) account for a growing share of weekly and monthly volumes.
• User wallet participation spikes tremendously during new launches compared to baseline periods.
• Volume decay curves compress, with the highest activity occurring in the first 24-72 hours post-launch.

‍

717ai Interpretation:

‍

Entering the new year, Virtuals has begun to function less like a static protocol and more like a high-velocity launch ecosystem, where new project onboarding, narrative timing, and user attention determines where volume and liquidity concentrate. For users and traders in this continuous discovery environment, participation and timing increasingly matters as much as conviction.

‍

II. New Launch Mechanisms Are Reshaping User Behavior

‍

One of the most consequential changes within the Virtuals ecosystem has been the introduction and refinement of new launch mechanics designed to attract higher-quality projects and broader user participation. These mechanisms materially affect how users interact with the protocol. Rather than passively accumulating exposure, users now behave in ways more consistent with event-driven markets, exhibiting higher transaction frequency and shorter decision cycles.

‍

Behavioral Shifts:

‍

• Increased transaction counts during launch periods, sometimes 10x activity during peak launches.
• Higher rates of new wallet participation for individual launches (increased by farming incentives).
• Shorter holding periods immediately following project debut.

‍

Supporting Metrics: 

‍

• New launches attract materially more unique wallets in the first 2 weeks than legacy projects during non-event periods (boosted by Virtuals site visibility).
• Median holding times compress around launch windows (days vs. weeks), with majority users recycling liquidity from legacy projects.
• Volume concentration is highest immediately post-launch, then redistributes to newer launches across the ecosystem.

‍

Recent Virtuals launches attract 1.5-2.5x more unique wallets in their first week compared to OG projects during non-event periods, while 40-60% of first-week trading volume typically occurs within the initial 24-72 hours post-launch.

‍

717ai Interpretation: 

‍

Virtuals users are increasingly tactical and attention-driven, with behavior influenced by new Pegasus, Unicorn, and Titan launch mechanisms and Virtual ecosystem-wide initiatives. This combined structual and behavioral shift has important implications: 

‍

• Ecosystem activity is no longer anchored to a small number of long-standing assets.
• Discovery, execution, and timing are becoming core determinants of outcomes.
• Launch design plays a first-order role in shaping liquidity quality and user composition.

‍

For users, traders, and builders, understanding how launches shape participation is now essential to navigating the Virtuals ecosystem effectively.

‍

III. Volume Concentration Shifts

‍

One of the clearest on-chain signals over recent weeks is the redistribution of volume within the Virtuals ecosystem. Where volume was once dominated by a small number of established assets, newer projects now regularly command the majority of daily trading activity.

‍

Observed Trends:

‍

• New projects frequently represent the top volume contributors shortly after launch.
• OG assets see volume spikes correlated with ecosystem-wide events, not steady organic growth.
• Social engagement and on-chain activity move in tight lockstep.

‍

717ai Data + Interpretation:

‍

• Top 12 Virtuals Leaderboard - 8 new projects, 2 Virtuals team projects, 2 OGs.
• Projects launched within 30-60 days now account for approximately 61-77% of weekly ecosystem trading volume.
• During new launches, unique wallet interactions increase by 200-300% relative to baseline periods.

‍

‍

IV. Virtuals Verticals: Robotics

‍

Beyond launch mechanisms, the Virtuals venture team has heavily invested in notable robotics projects such as $DEUS, $VADER and PrismaX. Unlike purely financial launches, robotics-focused projects are centered around real-world execution, autonomy, and AI-native infrastructure, introducing a different set of incentives and participant behavior. Robotics-focused projects within the Virtuals ecosystem display materially different engagement patterns compared to short-term, launchpad-style financial tokens.

‍

What Makes Robotics Different

‍

• Project teams building non-financial, data-oriented robotics systems.
• Users less sensitive to short-term price action.
• Capital aligned with longer development timelines.

‍

These characteristics are increasingly visible in on-chain behavior, not just narrative positioning.

‍

Observed On-chain Signals

‍

• 30-45% of first-month trading volume occurs after the initial 7-day launch window
• Median holding periods for wallets interacting with robotics projects are typically 3-5x longer.
• Less than 1/3 of robotics wallets regularly participate in short-term financial launches.
• Robotic project activity retains 40-55% more wallet participation over longer time periods.
• Trade frequency is lower, with 1.5x-2.5x trade size.

‍

717ai Interpretation: 

‍

Virtuals is evolving into a multi-vertical ecosystem, with robotics occupying the long-duration and conviction end of the spectrum while also complementing the faster-moving, attention-driven launch environment. Because of this, the ecosystem is beginning to segment into distinct sub-markets, each characterized by different: 

‍

• Liquidity Dynamics (fast-rotating vs. sticky capital)
• Time Horizons (event-driven vs development-driven)
• Risk Tolerances (price volatility vs execution risk)
• User Motivations (attention capture vs long-term alignment)

‍

For participants, this distinction matters:

Success in robotics-oriented projects is increasingly driven by longer-term alignment, development progress, and execution milestones, rather than launch timing or short-term liquidity cycles.

These patterns suggest that robotics projects within Virtuals are attracting a different class of participant: 

• Fewer event-driven traders
• More conviction-based holders
• Greater tolerance for development and execution risk

‍

V. What the Data Suggests About the Year Ahead

‍

Based on current on-chain behavior, Virtuals is likely to exhibit the following characteristics in the year ahead: 

‍

1. Higher launch velocity, with new projects driving episodic volume spikes
2. Faster narrative rotation, requiring active monitoring rather than passive exposure
3. Deeper segmentation, as infrastructure, robotics, and other financial-based projects attract different users
4. Increased important of execution, as timing and liquidity access outweigh long-term positioning

‍

VI. Practical Takeaways for Virtuals Users

‍

For Active Traders

‍

• Launch windows matter more than legacy positioning
• Liquidity depth and timing are increasingly critical
• Social signal tracking is now a core input, not a secondary one

‍

For Long-Term Participants

‍

• Ecosystem exposure matters more than single-asset conviction
• Robotics and agent infrastructure may behave differently from financial primitives
• Retention and developer momentum matter more than early price action

‍

For Builders

‍

• Launch design materially impacts user quality and retention
• Narrative clarity translated directly into on-chain activity
• Sustained engagement requires post-launch utility, not just attention

‍

717 Conclusion

‍

As part of the broader Base ecosystem, and with $WIRE launched within the same environment, 717 will continue to monitor Virtuals user behavior, volume flows, and launch dynamics as leading indicators of where on-chain activity is moving next.

Virtuals is becoming a launch-driven, attention-sensitive, multi-vertical ecosystem where user behavior determines outcomes.

For participants in the year ahead, understanding how users actually interact with Virtuals will matter more than understanding any single project.

‍

‍

Methodology Note: This report draws on public on-chain data, protocol-level activity, anonymized wallet behavior, and ecosystem observations surfaced through public discourse. Figures are directional and intended to highlight behavioral patterns rather than precise measurement.